| |
Massachusetts Nurse :: September
2005
Nurses in the News
Nurses make the case for H.2663 with letters
to the editor
Dedicated and concerned RNs from across Region 1
recently took the news about the MNA’s safe-staffing legislation
to their fellow citizens by sending letters to the editors of the
area’s key newspapers. The result: several important “media
hits” that put the MHA on the defensive in the middle of what
was already a hot campaign.
For guidance on how to write/send a letter to the editor of your
local paper call 781.830.5728, or click
here to write a letter to your editor via the Internet.
The Republican, Wednesday
July 13, 2005
Safe staffing ratios needed
to ensure patient safety
The recent article about author Suzanne Gordon's book
on the nursing shortage, combined with the three-quarter
page ads running in The Republican which discredit the
position of the professional nurses in Massachusetts
in regard to pending legislation to ensure safe staffing
ratios in hospitals, has spurred me on to inform my
fellow citizens of the true situation facing nursing
today.
As a registered nurse, working actively in clinical
settings and in nursing education for over 40 years,
I can assure you that the time has come to finally listen
to the nurses, those individuals who are actually giving
the care.
When the hospitals decided to restructure the way nursing
care was being delivered in hospitals in the late 1980s,
professional nurses were replaced in many settings by
"patient assistants" in order to reduce costs.
These "patient assistants" did the best they
could, but lacked educational preparation and clinical
expertise.
Nurses left acute care hospitals in droves, and research
demonstrated over and over that lack of control over
the work environment was a major factor in this exodus.
Nurses would no longer work in situations in which there
were too many, very sick patients to care for. The safety
of their patients was compromised by the insistence
of the hospitals to care for too many critically ill
patients, and nurses finally made their voices heard.
It is with certainty that I can tell you that there
will be no nurse shortage if nurses are allowed to do
what they are educated to do, and that is to safely
and compassionately care for patients. The proposed
bill supported by working nurses is House Bill 2663,
An Act Ensuring Patient Safety, which includes mandatory
RN-to-patient ratios. It is worthy of your support.
Patricia Triggs
Springfield |
|
Agawam Advertiser News, Thursday,
June 30, 2005
Call your state rep. to support
safe-staffing bill
Dear Editor:
To all Agawam residents: An important bill is pending
in the state legislature that can and will affect us
all. The bill is H.2663, An Act Ensuring Safe RN to
Patient Ratios.
RNs working at the bedside, caring for your family members,
friends and neighbors, want this bill to pass. The Massachusetts
Hospital Association’s “Patient First”
campaign has been mistaken for the safe-staffing bill.
The hospital association wanted people to make that
mistake.
Many people sent their legislators the form the MHA
put in newspapers and mailings, thinking they were supporting
better staffing. Instead, they were supporting a “pledge”
that will not put more nurses at the bedside where they
are needed. It will allow hospital administrators to
go on deciding what is adequate staffing when they are
paid to keep operating budgets lean. Many Massachusetts
hospitals are making record profits and administrators
are getting big paychecks.
Hospitals have the resources to hire more nurses and
studies show the nurses are out there. California passed
a safe-staffing bill and it is working without overburdening
hospitals. Short-staffing seems cheaper to short-sighted
administrators who refuse to account for the cost of
omissions and oversights made by overworked and overstressed
nurses.
Our state Rep. Daniel Keenan has not signed on in support
of H. 2663. Why? Maybe he needs to hear from all his
constituents who want him to support the RNs’
safe-staffing bill. His local office number is 786.4545.
The Boston office is 617.722.2060. Call him today. Ask
your family, friends and neighbors to call.
I am a nurse. I’ve worked in a hospital for 28
years. I’ve seen advances in health care and streamlining
of services. I’ve seen the amount of care needed
per patient increase. Nurses have to keep up on new
medications, new treatments and new technologies. More
paperwork is added all the time. Little is done to make
the job easier. New nurses have an ever-increasing amount
of knowledge to absorb. Basic care is the first to go
when technology is so time consuming.
The average age of Massachusetts nurses is 48. We move
patients who cannot move themselves. We lift heavy equipment.
We stand for long periods and we walk many miles a day
as we provide needed care. We get tired and we are asked
to stay overtime to cover understaffing. We worry that
we have overlooked something crucial to our patients’
health and safety. We need your help! Make a phone call
to Dan Keenan asking him to support H.2663 to make nursing
care safer.
Thank you. Someday it may make a difference to you or
a loved one.
Sue Hoague
Feeding Hills |
|
Daily Hampshire Gazette, Thursday
July 14, 2005
Take a stand for Patient Safety
Act
To the editor:
As a 40-year veteran of hospital nursing, I strongly
support the Massachusetts Nurses Association's safe
staffing legislation, the Patient Safety Act, House
Bill 2663. This is the only piece of legislation that
is being presented to our state legislators that identifies
nurse-to-patient ratios.
Over the last several years, studies and data have been
gathered and it is well-documented that with a 1:4 nurse
to patient ratio, care is safer and risk of injury is
lower. Any number above 4 increases the patients’
risk of injury by 7 percent.
Nurses do not want to give less than safe and quality
care to their patients. Many have left the profession
because of the safety risk for the patient and their
nursing license.
In a competing bill supported by the Massachusetts Hospital
Association and The Massachusetts Organization of Nurse
Executives there are no requirements for RN-to-patient
ratios or any uniform standard of care. If the hospital
industry bill passes, staffing levels will remain as
they are now —dangerously low. Patients' satisfaction
will not change, nurses' working conditions will not
change and the increased risk of patient injury will
remain as it is today—shamefully high.
Bound by my Massachusetts nursing license, I continue
to advocate for safe and quality nursing care for my
patients, my profession and the nurses of the future.
Many of my nursing colleagues share the same concerns
for quality and safe care and share the same passion
I have for the future of nursing.
I urge everyone who supports patient safety to contact
their local legislator and tell them you support House
Bill 2663. Ask them to support the bill because it makes
sense. This will ensure safe staffing numbers in all
health care settings.
Mary C. Powers
Westhampton |
|
|
|