|
11.30.2004
Statement by Karen Higgins, President
of the Massachusetts Nurses Association Regarding the Proposed
Hospital Industry Nurse Staffing Bill
Canton, Mass.—While we are
pleased that the Massachusetts Hospital Association has now
acknowledged that
a crisis exists
for the safety of patients in our state's hospitals, legislation
filed by the MHA and sponsored by Senator Richard Moore misses
the mark on patient safety and maintains the dangers of the status
quo.
All parties agree that we have a disturbing crisis
in Massachusetts — nurses
are being forced to care for too many patients at once, and patients
are suffering the consequences in the form of preventable errors,
avoidable complications, increased lengths of stay and readmissions.
Studies by the most respected scientific and medical researchers
affirm the significance of safe minimum RN-to-patient ratios
for patient safety.
Unfortunately, the MHA bill is written by hospital
administrators for hospital administrators and fails to provide
any minimum
standards that will protect hospital patients from the current
dangerous practice of understaffing of registered nurses. It
gives only the allusion of accountability. Nearly every requirement
called for in this bill is already called for under the industry's
accreditation process, a process that has proved totally ineffective
in guaranteeing patients safe care.
The primary problem with the bill is it fails
to heed the key findings of the scientific research and the
legislature's
own 2001 Nursing Commission report, which called for the implementation
of a minimum standard for nurse staffing ratios. Instead of addressing
this crisis and protecting patients with a minimum standard,
this measure protects an industry that has endorsed the practice
of understaffing of registered nurses to the detriment of patient
care.
Other problems with the measure include:
- Merely allows the hospital industry to file a report
about its staffing "plan", with no requirement that
they meet any minimum standard of safety.
- Approval of the staffing "plan" by
the Board of Directors of the hospital allows those responsible
for the
current practice of understaffing of registered nurses to continue
to approve similar staffing plans.
- Fails to address the root cause of the nursing crisis:
nurses burned out with high patient loads leaving the bedside.
This is the number one reason why RNs continue to leave the bedside.
Years of experience with recruitment incentives has proven that
they just don¹t work; the crisis is with retention.
- Calls for yet another commission to study
this issue. When the legislature conducted such a study in
2001, it recommended
the establishment of minimum RN-to-patient ratios.
However, on the issues of recruitment for future
nursing needs, the bill does include important recruitment
initiatives for nursing
faculty that should be acted upon immediately. Nursing school
enrollments are now full and, as a result, our state's
nursing programs have waiting lists. We must increase our supply
of nursing faculty to meet the demand for nurses to care for
an aging population in the coming decade. Massachusetts is fortunate
to have more RNs per capita than any state in the nation. While
we don't currently have a nursing shortage, we do have
a shortage of nurses willing to work in the acute care hospital
setting under current staffing levels. While continuing to work
to increase the long-term supply of RNs is important, addressing
the issue of retention to stem the exodus of both new and more
experienced RNs from the bedside is more critical.
The nurses of Massachusetts and the 70 health care and consumer
organizations that are part of the Coalition to Protect Massachusetts
Patients say the evidence is clear that legislation to set minimum
RN-to-patient ratios in hospitals is the only way to truly protect
patients.
State Rep. Christine Canavan (D-Brockton), who
is a registered nurse and vice chair of the Joint Committee
on Health Care, is
the lead sponsor for the bill, which is entitled "An Act
Ensuring Patient Safety." Canavan was also the chair of
a special legislative commission which was formed in 2001 to
study the crisis in nursing in Massachusetts.
The bill would protect Massachusetts patients
by ensuring that they receive nursing care appropriate to the
severity of their
medical conditions. To ensure maximum flexibility, the bill also
requires that the Department of Public Health develop an objective
system for monitoring patient medical conditions so that staffing
levels can be adjusted and improved to meet patient needs. The
bill would set minimum staffing standards specific to every unit
and department in a hospital to ensure that major disparities
in care levels do not exist in the commonwealth's hospitals,
and specifically provides that nothing in the bill "shall
be deemed to preclude any facility from increasing the number
of direct-care registered nurses."
The House Ways and Means Committee is in the
process of creating a subcommittee to address this bill. We
made a commitment to
work with all parties in this debate to craft a bill to address
this crisis. The Coalition to Protect Massachusetts Patients
and the MNA await the opportunity to work with the Committee
and all stakeholders to create a "real" solution
to the staffing crisis in our hospitals that guarantees safe
patient care and true accountability.
|