HHS
Study Finds Strong Link Between Patient Outcomes and Nurse
Staffing in Hospitals
- MNA Applauds Study For Demonstrating Positive
Impact Nurses Have on Patient Care
- Study Underscores Need for Legislation Pending
to Mandate Safe Staffing Levels
The number and mix of nurses in a hospital make a difference in
the quality of care patients receive, according to a Department
of Health and Human Services study released on Friday, April
20, 2001. For nurses in Massachusetts, the study's findings
provide a strong scientific underpinning for legislation pending
on Beacon Hill that would mandate improvements in nurse staffing
levels in Massachusetts health care facilities.
"This study validates what the Massachusetts Nurses
Association and thousands of nurses across the Commonwealth have
been saying for more than seven years – nurses are the key to
quality care in our hospitals and efforts to decreases nurses'
staffing levels are harming patients," said Denise Garlick, President
of the MNA, the canton-based professional association and the
state's largest union of registered nurses.
The study, Nurse Staffing and Patient Outcomes
in Hospitals, is based on 1997 data from more than 5 million
patient discharges from 799 hospitals in 11 states (including
Massachusetts). It found a strong and consistent relationship
between nurse staffing and five outcomes in medical patients
-- urinary tract infection, pneumonia, shock, upper gastrointestinal
bleeding, and length-of-stay. A higher number of registered nurses
was associated with a 3 percent to 12 percent reduction in the
rates of adverse outcomes, while higher staffing levels for all
types of nurses was associated with a decrease in adverse outcomes
from 2 percent to 25 percent.
According to the study, the costs associated with
patient complications can be substantial. Reductions in the rates
of adverse outcomes reduce hospital costs as well as significant
financial and psychological costs to patients and their families.
"The study findings show that nurse staffing matters
considerably to the well being of the hospital patients," said
Peter Buerhaus, co-project director for the study. "Perhaps the
study results will move health policy forward, making it possible
to provide hospitals and nurses with the resources that will
enrich staffing levels to the point where the adverse patient
outcomes we found can be reduced."
For years, the MNA has been raising concerns about
the negative impact of dramatic cutbacks in nurse staffing levels
at Massachusetts health care facilities. Nurses have claimed
these staffing reductions have resulted in a rapid deterioration
in nurses' working conditions, contributed to a dramatic shortage
of nurses, and placed patients in jeopardy.
In response, the MNA has already provided the industry
and policymakers with the mechanism to improve care for Massachusetts
Hospitals, and reap the cost benefits identified in the HHS study,
with its filing of HB 1186, An Act Relative to Sufficient Nurse
Staffing to Ensure Safe Patient Care. Sponsored by State Rep.
Christine Canavan and State Sen. Robert Creedon, both Democrats
from Brockton, this legislation would put in place a process
that would result in mandated staffing standards for all health
care providers based on the needs of the patients. A similar
bill was passed by the California legislature in 1999.
In addition to this study, recent nursing research,
as well as a number of media exposes, have made a clear link
between all of these issues and decreases in nursing staffing
levels and unsafe nurse-to-patient ratios. It is not uncommon
for medical/surgical nurses at a Massachusetts hospital to be
assigned between 9 – 12 patients on a shift, or nurses working
in long term care to be assigned 30 – 40 patients. Home care
nurses, who a few years ago were seeing 5-6 patients in a day,
are now being asked to see between 7-9 patients. And in all of
these settings, patients are more acutely ill and in need of
more nursing care. None of these ratios are considered safe,
and all contribute to the types of outcomes identified by this
study, according to the MNA.
HHS funded this study as a result of a series of
activities stemming from a 1993 congressional hearing that focused
national attention on the delivery of nursing care in hospitals
and its effect on patient care. Subsequently, the Institute of
Medicine examined the same issues and concluded that more research
was needed on the relationship between quality of patient care
in hospitals and the level and mix of nurse staffing. Four HHS
agencies—the Health Resources and Services Administration, Health
Care Financing Administration, Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality, and the National Institute of Nursing Research of
the National Institutes of Health – sponsored the study. It was
conducted by the Harvard University School of Public Health.
Copies of the study are available on HRSA's web
site at http://bhpr.hrsa.gov/dn/staffstudy.htm
|