National Nurses Union News and Information

Historical Background

In 2001 MNA held a special meeting in Worcester for members to vote on disaffiliating from the American Nurses Association (ANA).  That vote, the largest gathering of registered nurses in Massachusetts history, affirmed, by overwhelming numbers, the MNA membership’s desire to free themselves from an organization that not only failed to represent their views on the national stage, but indeed pushed for positions that were adverse to the interests of front-line staff nurses. The ANA’s continued position against RN-to-patient ratios is but one example of this. Immediately following that meeting, the following resolution for the formation of a new national nurses union was put on the floor of the meeting and adopted overwhelmingly. The text of that motion follows:

…Secondly, we hear you clearly to say that a national voice is a must for us. Therefore, we have planned to meet immediately with members from the California Nurses Association, the Pennsylvania Association of Staff Nurses and Allied Professionals, two other like-minded independent associations, to start the process of building a national.

In the years following disaffiliation, the membership has built MNA into a strong and powerful advocate for staff nurses and our patients. That work has been recognized nationally and we remain committed to advancing the issues of staff nurses, not only in our state, but in coordination with like-minded organizations. The MNA for many years has worked with the California Nurses Association to file federal legislation to prohibit the use of mandatory overtime and to coordinate position statements before the National Labor Relations Board. We have also supported their organizing efforts in Tenet-owned facilities. More recently, we have established contact and relationships with affiliates of the United American Nurses, including the Minnesota Nurses Association and the Michigan Nurses Association. In addition we have been meeting to share and evaluate strategies surrounding RN-to-patient ratio legislation as each of these states is at the point of pursuing their own version of a safe staffing bill. Both these organizations are affiliates of the AFL-CIO.

Similarly, our local bargaining units and regions have been developing relationships in their communities with many of the bargaining units actively involved the Central Labor Councils of the AFL-CIO. These relationships have allowed members to both give and receive support during contract struggles, as well as provided tremendous support for our nurse-to-patient ratio bill.

More recently at MNA’s 2008 Convention, the membership, in recognition of the sea change taking place in the national political landscape, recognized both the threat and opportunity that exist as the change in leadership of our nation changed to one more favorable to union democracy in the workplace.

The following motion was brought forward by members and passed overwhelmingly:

In these challenging times for patients and nurses, the voice of organized nurses cannot remain fractured. We, the MNA members, charge and authorize the MNA Board of Directors to participate as architects of an independent, national nurses union run by and for nurses; which would represent a majority of the nation’s unionized nurses; and to bring back that opportunity for a vote by the MNA membership.

While MNA left ANA in 2001, CNA (California Nurses Association) left ANA in 1995 for reasons much the same as ours and over time they formed a national presence by forming NNOC (National Nurses Organizing Committee). And now in 2008, the UAN (United American Nurses), formerly the labor arm of the ANA, has disaffiliated from the ANA with the affiliate bodies of the UAN formerly taking votes to disaffiliate and the Assembly of the UAN formerly voting to disaffiliate. Again, for much the same reasons as CNA and MNA, the UAN found the American Nurses Association directly contradicted the interests of direct care nurses and they were no longer willing to fund or be undermined by such an organization.

In the wake of this series of events, these three organizations, finally free from the ANA, have reached out to one another to explore the formation of a new national union to help all nurses join a union run by and for registered nurses.

The need for a powerful national voice has never been more important. The pressure on nurses, particularly in times of financial crisis, continues to increase. Today, more and more labor organizations are seeking to represent nurses, which will only continue to result in a fractured and disjointed voice for nurses ill prepared to meet the challenges we face.

Finally, with the election of Barack Obama and a Democratic Congress, the prospect for passage of the Employee Free Choice Act, legislation to make it easier to organize nurses, is very strong which presents a tremendous opportunity to mobilize and organize registered nurses across the nation for the betterment of all nurses and patients.

FPO