| |
MASSACHUSETTS NURSE NEWSLETTER :: November/December
2006
New report: substances common in hospitals can cause or
worsen asthma
Unbeknownst to many health care providers, the indoor hospital
environment may be making people sick. A new report reveals that
substances commonly found in hospitals—including chemicals
used to clean floors and medical equipment, fumes from building
materials, latex gloves, and other common substances—can
trigger an asthma attack or cause the disease. This is new information
in the effort to better understand what causes asthma and why
occupational rates of the disease have been steadily increasing.
This first-of-its-kind report was written by Health Care Without
Harm, an international coalition with 450 groups in 55 countries
working to make the health care industry safer and was released
by the Alliance for a Healthy Tomorrow, a statewide coalition
working to reduce toxic threats to human health. The report presents
rigorously researched hazard information about asthma triggers
and asthmagens found in health care settings, and shows how to
reduce problematic exposures.
“As places of healing, hospitals have a responsibility to
protect patients and workers from harmful chemicals and practices.
The good news is that safer alternatives are available. We urge
hospitals to take immediate action to clean up the indoor environment,”
said Bill Ravanesi, spokesman for HCWH.
The key conclusions of the report include:
-
There is considerable cause for concern that
substances commonly used and found in health care can cause
or trigger asthma.
-
Among the worst exposures in health care are
formaldehyde (found in chemically-treated fabrics, carpets,
pressed wood and other products); cleaners, disinfectants and
sterilants; natural rubber latex; tobacco smoke; and biologic
allergens.
-
Nurses may be among the most exposed to some
hazardous chemicals identified in the report including the disinfectant
gluteraldehyde and the sterilizing agent ethylene oxide.
-
Hospitals can use safer alternatives to many
substances or modify standard practices in order to limit peoples’
exposure to asthmagens.
Asthma is a public health crisis. In the U.S., the number of
people with asthma has more than doubled over the last two decades.
In 2005, the MA DPH found that 9.5 percent of school children
in Massachusetts have been diagnosed with asthma and according
to a 2006 report by the Asthma Regional Council, nearly 15 percent
of adults in New England have had asthma. Asthma now costs the
nation $16.1 billion annually in health care, loss of work productivity
and premature death.
Workplace exposures are a particular problem. Asthma is the most
commonly reported workplace lung condition. An estimated 10 to
23 percent of all adult-onset asthma cases are due to workplace
exposures, and a significant portion of those cases occur in health
care workers. Furthermore, among the cases of work-related asthma
reported to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health between
the years of 1993-2004, the health care industry accounted for
30 percent of all work-related asthma cases.
“Many nurses have suffered from workplace asthma due to
exposure to chemical sterilants, disinfectants, deodorizers, cleaning
products and floor buffing and stripping chemicals,” said
Janice Homer, R.N. who developed asthma after being exposed to
toxic cleaning products while working at a Massachusetts hospital.
“Hospitals should heed recommendations in this report and
carefully chose and use chemicals to reduce chemical exposures
for patients and nurses,” Homer said.
“Ironically many products used in health care to keep people
safe from pathogens can cause or exacerbate asthma in susceptible
people,” said Ted Schettler, MD and science director of
Science and Environmental Health Network. “Fortunately there
are alternative products and practices that hospitals can use
to accomplish their goals without increasing asthma risks.”
In the next legislative session the Massachusetts Legislature
will consider bills that would replace toxic chemicals in consumer
products and in the workplace with safer alternatives, including
“An Act for a Healthy Massachusetts: Safer Alternatives
to Toxic Chemicals.” The bill would replace toxic chemicals
in common products with safer alternatives where feasible. When
a safer alternative is not currently available, the bill would
stimulate research and development into new technologies and solutions.
In the case of hospitals and healthcare settings, safer alternatives
are readily available to toxic cleaning products, latex, building
materials that contain volatile organic compounds (VOCs), products
made of PVC plastic (vinyl), some acrylics and pesticides.
“It doesn’t make sense to continue using dangerous
toxic chemicals when there are safer alternatives available,”
stated Lee Ketelsen, Clean Water Action New England director.
“Unnecessary harm is being done to the health of workers,
consumers and children. This unnecessary danger will continue
until we pass the Safer Alternatives Bill and create safe products
and safe workplaces,” she concluded.
To obtain a copy of the report, visit www.noharm.org
or call 703.243.0056.
|
|