|
12.15.2007
Chemical exposures on the job may be linked
to diseases in nurses
First ever national survey finds widespread exposure to chemicals
and radiation and almost no mandatory workplace health protections
WASHINGTON—A first ever national
survey of nurses’ exposures to chemicals, pharmaceuticals and radiation
on the job suggests there are links between serious health problems
such as cancer, asthma, miscarriages and children's birth defects
and the duration and intensity of these exposures. The survey included
1,500 nurses from all 50 states.
The survey was conducted by the Washington-based nonprofit
Environmental Working Group and are available online at, http://www.ewg.org/reports/nursesurvey.
Every day, nurses confront low-level but repeated
exposures to mixtures of hazardous materials that include residues
from medications, anesthetic gases, sterilizing and disinfecting
chemicals, radiation, latex, cleaning chemicals, hand and skin disinfection
products, and even mercury escaping from broken medical equipment.
There are no workplace safety standards to protect nurses from the
combined effects of these exposures on their health.
“Nurses are exposed daily to scores of different
toxic chemicals and other hazardous materials whose cumulative health
risks have never been studied,” said Jane Houlihan, Vice President
for Research at Environmental Working Group. “Nurses ingest, touch
or breathe residues of any number of these potentially harmful substances
as they care for patients, day after day and face potential but
unstudied health problems as a result.”
According to the survey results, nurses who were
exposed regularly—at least once a week—to the chemicals
had increased rates of cancer, asthma and miscarriages. Nurses who
were pregnant when they were exposed to certain chemicals were more
likely to have children with birth defects than nurses not exposed
to the chemicals.
Chemical exposure seemed to have an especially large
impact on the rate of musculoskeletal defects in children of pregnant
nurses. Nurses with frequent exposure to sterilizing agents and
anesthetic gases were seven to nine times more likely to have children
with musculoskeletal defects than their unexposed peers.
The Centers for Disease Control proposed a National
Occupational Exposure Survey for the health care industry in 2002.
To date, no such survey has been initiated to better
understand the range of potentially hazardous chemical exposure
in the health care industry and related illnesses.
"For many of the toxic chemicals in hospitals there
are safer alternative or safer processes. We must make these healthier
choices for the sake of our patients, nurses and all hospital employees,"
said Barbara Sattler, RN, DrPH, FAAN, Professor and Director of
the Environmental Health Education Center at the University of Maryland
School of Nursing."
MNA has worked for the last 10 years to teach frontline
nurses about the hazards they are exposed to at work and how personal
protective equipment and safe work practices will reduce these exposures.
On the MNA website www.massnurses.org,
using the Health and Safety page, you can learn more about many
of the healthcare workplace exposures," said Evie Bain, Associate
Director in the MNA's Division of Occupational Health and Safety
"MNA activism, legislation and labor/management actions have
often reduced or eliminated exposures to substances such as natural
rubber latex, glutaraldehyde, needlestick injuries and mercury.
OSHA and NIOSH also provide information on safe work practices to
protect the health of all nurses, their unborn children as well
as their patients. These materials are available at the websites
www.dol.gov/OSHA
and www.cdc.gov/NIOSH
."
Environmental Working Group is a nonprofit research
organization based in Washington, DC that uses the power of information
to protect human health and the environment. The survey was co-sponsored
by the nonprofit group Health Care Without Harm, the University
of Maryland's Environmental Health Education Center and the American
Nurses Association. The MNA consulted on the wording of the questionnaire.
|