|
11.29.2006
Following Recent News of the FDA’s $5.7
Million Fine of the American Red Cross For Poor Blood Donor Screening
and Safety Violations
Dedham-based ARC of New England Continues to Seek Elimination of
Registered Nurses to Oversee the Safety of Donors and Blood Drives
Protecting the RNs’ Role in Monitoring of Blood
Drives Is Key Issue in Current Contract Dispute with the Agency
Dedham, Mass.—In the wake of recent news
reports of the federal government’s decision to fine the American
Red Cross $5.7 million for inadequate blood donor screening and
violation of blood safety laws, the Dedham-based American Red Cross
Blood Services – New England Region (ARC) is seeking to eliminate
the role of registered nurses in screening donors and monitoring
the safety of blood drives.
The issue of replacing highly skilled and licensed registered nurses
with non-licensed technicians to oversee blood drives is at the
heart of an ongoing contract dispute between the unionized registered
nurses and management of the ARC in New England. The agency’s
demand would mean there may not be qualified RNs on hand to assess
donors and to respond to complications that arise. Both parties
met with a mediator on Monday, with no movement towards a settlement.
In response, the nurses are continuing to take their case to the
public and to sponsors of ARC blood drives for support in protecting
donors’ access to monitoring and care by registered nurses.
“As the recent news reports make clear, the issue of donor
screening is extremely important. We believe this is an issue of
great concern for the public because nurses play a vital role in
protecting the safety of our blood donors and blood supply,”
said Barbara Jackson, RN, a nurse in the American Red Cross and
the chair of the union’s negotiating committee. “The
RN has the knowledge and experience in conducting thorough assessment
and screening of the donors, as well as in keeping donors safe.
Donors have reactions, sometimes resulting in serious injuries.
It is not uncommon for patients to faint and hit their heads resulting
in concussions and lacerations. They can experience arterial sticks,
cardiac problems and anaphylactic allergic reactions. The nurse’s
evaluation may result in the need for the donor to seek further
medical care, a call to 911 or a follow up with their primary MD.”
The ARC employs 45 registered nurses throughout the state. The
RNs, who are represented by the Massachusetts Nurses Association
(MNA), have been negotiating their new contract since July 12, 2006,
with the assistance of a federal mediator. The nurses’ contract
expired on August 15, 2006. On Oct. 25, the American Red Cross presented
their last best offer to the nurses. The nurses cast an overwhelming
vote to reject the offer at a membership meeting held on Nov. 5.
The two parties are scheduled to meet again on Friday.
The RNs provide numerous services within the ARC’s Whole
Blood, Platelet Apheresis and Double Reds Cell programs. The Platelet
Apheresis program is a specific form of blood donation that involves
the collection of a donor’s platelets which in return is usually
given to a cancer patient while in treatment. The MNA-represented
nurses work out of four different regional offices located in Dedham
(which is also the headquarters for the Red Cross), Springfield,
Worcester and Danvers.
Jackson points out that the current effort to replace nurses with
technicians to oversee blood drives is part of a concerted effort
by the agency to break the nurses’ union and completely eliminate
the role of the registered nurse from the agency altogether.
“This agency was founded by nurses, and it built its reputation
on the work and skill of nurses,” said Jackson. “We
are concerned that the organization’s purely business mentality
has put the bottom line ahead of quality services. Management’s
stance in these negotiations is an attempt to silence the voice
of nurses at the Red Cross. We want the public to know that what
is at stake in these negotiations is the very heart and soul of
this revered organization.”
###
|