| |
07.26.2001
Sadly, Brockton Hospital continues to play games and engage in
stalling tactics, as today's talks again went nowhere. The hospital
refused to present any formal proposals to move the process forward,
at the same time that more and more leaders from across the state
are calling upon Mr. Goodman to take the initiative and responsibility
to end this dispute. See and share the press release below which
describes recent events.
Brockton Talks End Again With No Movement As Management Fails
to Present Any Proposals to Reach Settlement
BROCKTON, Mass.—As the Brockton Hospital
nurses strike completed its 63rd day, the nurses and management
failed once again to reach an agreement in talks held today in
the offices of the federal mediator in Boston. The negotiation
session was only the third to be held since the nurses' strike
began on May 25, 2001.
The talks ended when hospital management refused to offer any formal
proposals for the nurses to consider, including a proposal to deal
with the central issue in the dispute, which is the nurses' call
for a contractual commitment by the hospital to use its best efforts
to fully staff the hospital to avoid the dangerous practice of
mandatory overtime. The nurses have been waiting since May 22 for
the hospital to make a comprehensive proposal to move the talks
towards a settlement to end the strike. While the hospital offered
to "dialogue" about staffing issues, they refused to make any written
proposals to move the process forward.
"We told the hospital that the only way collective bargaining can happen is through
the exchange of and negotiation over proposals. We've been dialoguing about this
issue for five years now with no positive result. We have told them repeatedly
that they need to come closer to our position, particularly over the issues of
staffing if we are ever going to reach a settlement to end this strike. Apparently,
they are not ready to engage in serious negotiations at this time," said Linda
McMahon, RN, co-chair of the nurses' bargaining unit.
The talks ended with an offer by the nurses to come back to the
negotiating table, as early as the next day, if and when the hospital
was ready to present a proposal to move the process along. The
nurses are awaiting word from the federal mediator that the hospital
is prepared to respond to their offer.
The hospital's refusal to submit substantive contract proposals
comes on the heels of a number of appeals from prominent political
figures in the state who have sided with the nurses in calling
upon hospital management to take the initiative in negotiating
a settlement. This week, Senate President Thomas Birmingham and
State Senator from Brockton Robert Creedon visited the nurses'
strike line to offer their support to the nurses. Senator Birmingham
also mailed a letter to Brockton Hospital CEO Norman Goodman urging
him to reach a fair settlement to end the strike. Also, yesterday,
the entire Massachusetts Congressional Delegation signed onto a
letter addressed to Mr. Goodman urging him to "redouble your efforts
to resolve the ongoing contract dispute.." The letter goes on to
say that "it is critical to address the impact of staffing constraints
and related compensation issues if the hospital is to meet ..quality
of care standards." Earlier this week, the Brockton City Council
passed a resolve submitted by Ward 5 City Councilor Dennis Denapoli,
calling upon both parties to come before the City Council to discuss
the issues behind the dispute.
They key stumbling block towards a settlement continues to be the
failure to adequately deal with the issue of staffing at the hospital.
While the nurses are seeking a written commitment in the contract
that the hospital will provide safe and appropriate staffing to
avoid mandatory overtime, the hospital had proposed the formation
of an "advisory committee" that would meet twice annually. The
committee would "not have the authority to modify staffing levels...or
to negotiate over terms and conditions of employment."
Before the strike began, the nurses had already told the hospital
they had no interest in an advisory committee. In fact, the nurses
and management have had a "professional issues" committee as part
of their contract sine 1996. Over the last five years, staffing
issues had been discussed at nearly every meeting of that committee,
with absolutely no effort by the hospital to address the concerns
raised. It is precisely because the nurses have been unable to
have their concerns addressed through this committee and other
avenues that they have gone out on strike to win language that
holds the hospital accountable for providing adequate staffing.
"The problem here is the hospital continues to refuse to address the nurses'
real concerns over long term problems with staffing at our facility," McMahon
explained. "Instead of negotiating to address our concerns, they have used these
negotiations to posture over the issue, taken out full-page ads to misrepresent
and mislead the public about these issues, and purposely prolonged a strike that
is costing this hospital millions of dollars."
The nurses have been seeking the same language to address staffing
and mandatory overtime concerns that was negotiated by the nurses
at St. Vincent Hospital last year, which ended the nurses 49-day
strike. This same language has been accepted by three other Massachusetts
hospitals in the last four months. It is the first paragraph of
this proposal that is the primary cause of the strike. Specifically,
it reads: "The Hospital will reasonably determine the level of
registered nurse staffing needed for safe and appropriate care
on all nursing units, and will exercise its best efforts to provide
that level of staffing through its regular and per diem nursing
force without resort to overtime.
Nurses at Brockton Hospital have a long history of problems with
management over the issue of mandatory overtime, i.e. forcing a
nurse against her/his will to work extra hours or shifts to compensate
for a lack of appropriate staffing. It was the principle issue
of concern in their last contract negotiations of 1998. While the
hospital had promised to eliminate the problem, the practice continued
at an even higher rate. The underlying cause of mandatory overtime
is a shortage of staff. The hospital has refused to recruit and
retain enough staff to safely operate the facility, while it has
dramatically increased its census (patient volume) in recent years.
There simply aren't enough nurses hired by the hospital to cover
the shifts required to care for the patients being admitted to
the facility.
Back to Brockton Strike Page
|
|