|
St. Vincent's Strike
St. Vincent's Hospital RNs And Tenet To
Talk Tomorrow As Strike Deadline Looms
- Nurses Will Begin Strike on March 31st
Unless Tenet Resolves Outstanding Issues
- Pre-Strike Rally Planned for March 30th
at Vernon Hill Post from 6 – 9 p.m
Nurse Outraged By Hospital's Demand to Use Mandatory
Overtime in Place of Safe Staffing
WORCESTER, Mass.—Registered
nurses represented by the Massachusetts Nurses Association (MNA)
at St. Vincent's Hospital in Worcester go back to the negotiating
table with Tenet Health Care management tomorrow, March 29, 2000,
in a last ditch effort to settle remaining issues in dispute and
avert a strike scheduled to begin at 6 a.m. on March 31, 2000.
The session, which was requested by Tenet and will be held with
a federal mediator, will begin at 10 a.m. The MNA will contact
the media when the talks are completed, and nurses will be available
for comment. For information, call the MNA Communications
Department at 781.830.5717 or 781.249.0430, or call the St. Vincent's
Nurses' Strike Office at 508.792.2181.
Barring a settlement at tomorrow's talks, the nurses
are proceeding with their plan to strike, which includes assisting
nurses in finding work assignments at area hospitals and mobilizing
committees to manage strike-related activities. This includes plans
for running 24-hour picket lines at both St. Vincent's Hospital
and the new Worcester Medical Center, working with other labor unions,
political and community leaders to build support for the nurses'
cause, fundraising to support the striking nurses, and educating
citizens about the issues behind the strike. Last week
the nurses opened a strike office at the Carpenters Union Building
at 29 Endicott Street. This week, Richard Rafferty, managing
partner for the Worcester-based law firm of Eden, Tollins and Rafferty
donated space in the firm's offices for a satellite strike office
at 19 Norwich Street, which is less than a block away from the new
Worcester Medical Center.
"We sincerely hope that Tenet management will come
to the table prepared to resolve the remaining issues that are holding
up the settlement of this contract," said Sandy Ellis, a nurse at
the facility and spokesperson for the bargaining unit. "After
two years and 45 negotiating sessions, we are close to a settlement,
and it would be a shame if Tenet wanted to force a strike, particularly
over their unreasonable demand to use mandatory overtime as an alternative
to providing safe staffing at this new facility. Throughout this
process, and especially in our last negotiating session, the nurses
have made substantial concessions to settle this contract. Enough
is enough, it's time for Tenet to do what is necessary to reach
an agreement and prevent a strike. "
The two parties last met on March 24, when talks
broke down over a number of issues, with the most significant
being the issues of mandatory overtime and the hospital's refusal
to allow the nurses to engage in protected negotiations over issues
related to the move to Worcester Medical Center.
The issue of mandatory overtime is the single most
important issue of concern to the nurses. Currently, the hospital
does not use mandatory overtime. Under the new contract, the
hospital is demanding the right to mandate double shifts for nurses,
forcing nurses against their will to work up to 16 hours straight,
something nurses believe is dangerous to patient care.
The nurses want to place strict limits on forced
overtime to prevent the practice from being used as a means of compensating
for a lack of safe staffing at the facility. The nurses also want
the right to refuse overtime if they feel fatigued or incapable
of providing safe care. The hospital would only agree to allow
a nurse to refuse mandatory overtime once every quarter.
"Tenet's stance on this issues says everything there
is to say about this corporation's lack of commitment to quality
patient care," said Ellis. "If we concede this issue, we concede
everything we stand for as nurses, and as legally-mandated advocates
for our patients' safety. We cannot allow this hospital to staff
this hospital by doubling the workload of its nurses, thereby placing
patients in the hands of exhausted practitioners. Nurses have
a hard enough time making it through there regularly assigned shifts
under current staffing conditions, there is no way we should be
forced to make it through an unplanned double shift. It's
a recipe for tragedy, and we cannot and will not abide a contract
that sanctions this practice."
The second unresolved issue concerns the nurses'
legal right to negotiate over the impact of the move into the Worcester
Medical Center. The union has already filed a charge against
the hospital with the National Labor Relations Board for its refusal
to provide information the nurses need to bargain effectively.
The hospital has also flatly refused to allow the nurses' union
representative to enter the building and tour the facility.
The nurses have been trying to negotiate over the
move for months, but Tenet has stonewalled the process, leaving
little time to address the issues as the date of the move fast approaches.
The nurses offered a concession to the hospital whereby they would
negotiate all aspects related to the move after it had taken place,
thereby allowing the new hospital to open without a strike. However,
the nurses wanted to retain their union rights for a process of
dispute resolution should issues remain unresolved after the move.
Specifically, the nurses wanted to maintain either their right to
strike, or the right to submit unresolved issues to interest arbitration.
The hospital refused.
"We offered to help them get this process done and
expedite the move into this new facility," Ellis explained. "But
they refused to grant us our most basic union rights to allow that
to happen. What we want to know is why? What are they afraid
of? Why won't they provide us with the information we have
every right to receive about staffing levels and work assignments
in the new facility? Why won't they let our representative tour
the facility?"
At the last session the parties did come to agreement
on some other key issues for the nurses, including the issue of
nurses' hours of work and shift assignments. Both sides made
concessions on the issue. The hospital originally wanted the unrestricted
right to unilaterally change a nurse's hours of work and shift assignments.
They also agreed that before any change is made, management would
need to negotiate over the change, and if a resolution was not reached,
the issue would be subject to expedited arbitration by a neutral
third party. The parties also came to an agreement on Tenet's controversial
flex-time policy, whereby the hospital has the right to send nurses
home when they believe census is low, forcing the nurses to use
their vacation time in lieu of lost pay. The compromise limits the
amount of flex time assigned and phases out the policy after three
years.
On March 16, the nurses voted by a greater than
2 to 1 margin to authorize the union's negotiating committee to
call a strike. The nurses issued their official notice to strike
on March 17, after negotiations failed to reach a settlement on
a number of issues.
The nurses have planned a pre-strike rally for March
30, 2000, from 6 – 9 p.m. at the Vernon Hill American Legion Post
on Providence Street. A number of nursing and labor leaders, as
well as political officials have agreed to attend the rally to support
the nurses as they prepare to strike on the following day.
The nurses have been using the collective bargaining
process to address their number one concern at the facility, which
is to improve staffing levels and working conditions at the hospital.
According to the MNA, St. Vincent's Hospital has the worst record
of documented unsafe staffing reports of any of the 85 hospitals
where the MNA represents registered nurses in the state. In the
past 24 months, nurses have filed more than 450 unsafe staffing
reports, which are official reports, nurses file whenever they feel
"their patients are in jeopardy."
Recent Research Supports Nurses Concerns for
Patient Safety Under Mandatory Overtime
Nursing and workplace research supports the St.
Vincent's nurses' concerns for patient and nurse safety under conditions
of excessive, unplanned overtime.
For example, a study of nurses in Massachusetts
conducted by the American Journal of Public Health in 1992 found
that nurses who work variable schedules (such as mandated overtime
shifts) were twice as likely to report an accident or error, and
two-and-one-half times more likely to report near miss accidents.
It concluded that these conditions were associated with "frequent
lapses of attention and increased reaction time, leading to increase
error rates on performance of tasks."
In a 1989 article published in the Journal of Occupational
Health & Safety, the author stated, "Once a shift exceeds 12
consecutive hours, acute fatigue sets in, a worker may still be
able to perform routine tasks, but his brain waves exhibit a pattern
of stage one alpha sleep. Errors made in this state are frequently
major, since the worker tends to perform the opposite of the correct
action."
The Institute of Medicine just last Fall published
a report on the dramatic rise in medication errors in United States
hospitals, which causes the death of between 48,000 and 98,000 patients
each year, depending on the study cited.
Nurses are intimately involved in medication administration
in hospitals, as they are the ones who are ultimately responsible
for ensuring that patients get their medication, receive the right
amount of medication, and receive it at the appropriate time.
Most important of all, nurses are responsible for assessing the
patient to make sure the patient is responding appropriately, or
to spot any adverse reactions to medications and take immediate
steps to address problems that may arise.
The report clearly states that designing safe medication
administration systems for hospitals requires that nurses work with
appropriate staffing levels, and that they are well rested. The
report states, "Designing jobs with attention to human factors means
attending to the effect of work hours, workloads, staff ratios,
sources of distraction, and inversion in assigned shifts (which
affects worker's circadian rhythms) and their relationship to fatigue,
alertness and sleep deprivation…"
Back to Strike Page
|