|
St.Vincent Strike
St. Vincent's RNs and Tenet Fail to Reach Agreement
As Talks Break Down Over Mandatory Overtime Issue And Tenet's Refusal
to Negotiate Move to Medical Center: Nurses Intend to Strike
on March 31st
WORCESTER, Mass.—After a
marathon 13-hour negotiating session, talks between the St. Vincent's
Hospital nurses and Tenet Health Care broke down late last night
over the issues of mandatory overtime and the hospital's refusal
to allow the nurses to engage in protected negotiations over issues
related to the move to Worcester Medical Center. While the nurses
were willing to stay and continue negotiating, the hospital broke
off the talks at 11 a.m. If Tenet management fails to come
back to the table to address the two outstanding issues, the nurses
intend to strike at 6 a.m. on March 31, 2000.
The issue of mandatory overtime is the single most
important issue of concern to the nurses. Currently, the hospital
does not use mandatory overtime. Under the new contract, the
hospital is demanding the right to mandate double shifts for nurses,
forcing nurses against their will to work up to 16 hours straight,
something nurses believe is dangerous to patient care.
The nurses want to place strict limits on forced
overtime to prevent the practice from being used as a means of compensating
for a lack of safe staffing at the facility. The nurses also want
the right to refuse overtime if they feel fatigued or incapable
of providing safe care. The hospital would only agree to allow
a nurse to refuse mandatory overtime once every quarter.
"Tenet's stance on this issue says everything there
is to say about this corporation's lack of commitment to quality
patient care," said Sandy Ellis, RN, spokesperson for the nurses'
bargaining unit. "If we concede this issue, we concede everything
we stand for as nurses, and as legally-mandated advocates for our
patients' safety. We cannot allow this organization to staff
this hospital by doubling the workload of its nurses, thereby placing
patients in the hands of exhausted practitioners. Nurses have
a hard enough time making it through there regularly assigned shifts
under current staffing conditions, there is no way we should be
forced to make it through an unplanned double shift. It's
a recipe for tragedy, and we cannot and will not abide a contract
that sanctions this practice."
The second unresolved issue concerns the nurses
legal right to negotiate over the impact of the move into the new
Worcester Medical Center. The union has already filed a charge
against the Tenet with the National Labor Relations Board for its
refusal to provide information the nurses need to bargain effectively.
The hospital has also flatly refused to allow the nurses' union
representative to enter the building and tour the facility.
The nurses have been trying to negotiate over the
move for months, but Tenet has stonewalled the process, leaving
little time to address the issues as the date of the move fast approaches.
The nurses offered a concession to the hospital whereby they would
negotiate all aspects related to the move after it had taken place,
thereby allowing the new hospital to open without a strike. However,
the nurses wanted to retain their union rights for a process of
dispute resolution should issues remain unresolved after the move.
Specifically, the nurses wanted to maintain either their right to
strike, or the right to submit unresolved issues to interest arbitration.
The hospital refused.
"We offered to help them get this process done and
expedite the move into this new facility," Ellis explained.
"But they refused to grant us our most basic union rights to allow
that to happen. What we want to know is why? What are
they afraid of? Why won't they provide us with the information
we have every right to receive about staffing levels and work assignments
in the new facility? Why won't they let our representative
tour the facility? It leads us to believe they are not ready
to open this facility, or that they have something to hide from
us."
The parties did come to agreement on some other
key issues for the nurses, including the issue of nurses' hours
of work and shift assignments. Both sides made concessions
on the issue. The hospital originally wanted the unrestricted
right to unilaterally change a nurse's hours of work and shift assignments.
Last night, they agreed that before any change is made, management
would need to negotiate over the change, and if a resolution was
not reached, the issue would be subject to expedited arbitration
by a neutral third party. The parties also came to an agreement
on Tenet's controversial flex-time policy, whereby the hospital
has the right to send nurses home when they believe census is low,
forcing the nurses to use their vacation time in lieu of lost pay.
The compromise reached tonight limits the amount of flex time assigned
and phases out the policy after three years.
The two sides last negotiated on March 17, 2000,
which ended with no significant movement, causing the nurses to
issue their official notice to strike on March 31, 2000. On
March 16, the nurses voted by a greater than 2 to 1 margin to authorize
the union's negotiating committee to call a strike.
This week, the nurses opened a strike office in
the Carpenters Union Building at 29 Endicott Street in Worcester.
The nurses have planned a pre-strike rally for March 30, 2000, from
6 – 9 p.m. at the Vernon Hill American Legion Post on Providence
Street. A number of nursing and labor leaders, as well as
political officials have agreed to attend the rally to support the
nurses as they prepare to strike on the following day.
The nurses have been using the collective bargaining
process to address their number one concern at the facility, which
is to improve staffing levels and working conditions at the hospital.
According to the MNA, St. Vincent's Hospital has the worst record
of documented unsafe staffing reports of any of the 85 hospitals
where the MNA represents registered nurses in the state. In
the past 24 months, nurses have filed more than 450 unsafe staffing
reports, which are official reports, nurses file whenever they feel
"their patients are in jeopardy."
Recent Research Supports Nurses Concerns for
Patient Safety Under Mandatory Overtime
Nursing and workplace research supports the St.
Vincent's nurses' concerns for patient and nurse safety under conditions
of excessive, unplanned overtime.
For example, a study of nurses in Massachusetts
conducted by the American Journal of Public Health in 1992 found
that nurses who work variable schedules (such as mandated overtime
shifts) were twice as likely to report an accident or error, and
two-and-one-half times more likely to report near miss accidents.
It concluded that these conditions were associated with "frequent
lapses of attention and increased reaction time, leading to increase
error rates on performance of tasks."
In a 1989 article published in the Journal of Occupational
Health & Safety, the author stated, "Once a shift exceeds 12
consecutive hours, acute fatigue sets in, a worker may still be
able to perform routine tasks, but his brain waves exhibit a pattern
of stage one alpha sleep. Errors made in this state are frequently
major, since the worker tends to perform the opposite of the correct
action."
The Institute of Medicine just last Fall published
a report on the dramatic rise in medication errors in United States
hospitals, which causes the death of between 48,000 and 98,000 patients
each year, depending on the study cited.
Nurses are intimately involved in medication administration
in hospitals, as they are the ones who are ultimately responsible
for ensuring that patients get their medication, receive the right
amount of medication, and receive it at the appropriate time.
Most important of all, nurses are responsible for assessing the
patient to make sure the patient is responding appropriately, or
to spot any adverse reactions to medications and take immediate
steps to address problems that may arise.
The report clearly states that designing safe medication
administration systems for hospitals requires that nurses work with
appropriate staffing levels, and that they are well rested.
The report states, "Designing jobs with attention to human factors
means attending to the effect of work hours, workloads, staff ratios,
sources of distraction, and inversion in assigned shifts (which
affects worker's circadian rhythms) and their relationship to fatigue,
alertness and sleep deprivation.."
Back to Strike Page |